| Home About Contact | ||||
| Legal System | ||||
Chapters
|
Preamble |
Chapters
| ||
| Under the Tories, the major change to the legal system was that eligibility for Legal Aid fell from 79% to 48% of the population, so that only the poor or the very rich, who could afford the costs, were able to go to law. Attempts to restrict the right to trial by jury were opposed by Labour. Judges, etc. remained unrepresentative of the general population, and the legal system unaccountable to the House of Commons because it was led by the Lord Chancellor who sat in the Lords. | ||||
| Labour policy was: | ||||
| 1 | A Legal Aid system allowing everyone to afford representation | |||
| 2 | To oppose the use of "No win, No fee" charging systems as a "gimmick" | |||
| 3 | No further restrictions on the right to trial by jury | |||
| 4 | To create a Department for Legal Administration under a minister in the Commons | |||
| 5 | To have an independent judicial appointments commission to recommend all judges and QCs on objective and open criteria | |||
| 6 | To review the funding of legal vocational training to help poorer people enter the legal profession | |||
| 7 | To set up an independent review body to investigate suspected miscarriages of justice | |||
| 8 | To incorporate the European Convention of Human Rights into British law | |||
| In fact under New Labour: | ||||
| 1 | Legal Aid was removed for a wide range of civil cases, and was so underfunded that few solicitors were prepared to take cases | |||
| 2 | "No win, No fee" became the norm for lawyers' charges and there was an increase in US-style "ambulance chasing" | |||
| 3 | The option of jury trial was removed e.g. for many serious crimes | |||
| 4 | A Ministry of Justice was set up under a minister in the Commons | |||
| 5 | This was achieved except that the system for judges still allowed closed consultations | |||
| 6 | (Funding?) but alternative routes into the law were considered | |||
| 7 | This review body was set up | |||
| 8 | This was done, then required an opt-out to allow the indefinite detention of terror suspects without charge or trial, and was threatened with further changes | |||
| In addition: | ||||
| The principle of a presumption of innocence was threatened, e.g. telling jurors of past convictions [law now?], needing proof that assets are not from crime | ||||
| US requests to extradite Britons now need offer no evidence | ||||
| New Labour used evidence obtained by torture abroad against terror suspects in the UK | ||||
| The new supreme court separated the judiciary from the legislature but, with prisons policy under the Ministry of Justice, judges feared interference with their decisions | ||||
|
|
Independence of decisions was threatened by changes to the Parole Board and was a concern for legal aid too |
| ||
| Home About Contact | ||||